When Suleiman the Magnificent died in 1566, he left behind not only a vast empire but an illusion of permanence. The empire still stretched from Algiers to Baghdad and from Budapest to Mecca. Its courts dazzled as its palaces glittered. Yet beneath the splendor, cracks were forming and over the next three centuries, the house that Osman built would slowly buckle under the weight of change, resistance, and time itself. It didn’t collapse suddenly, that was the tragedy. Rather, it decayed... quite slowly.
The Ottomans had once been masters of adaptation, absorbing languages, customs and technologies. But in the wake of Suleiman’s reign, this adaptability dulled. His immediate successors, Selim II, Murad III and Mehmed III, lacked his vision. They ruled from within the gilded confines of Topkapı Palace, increasingly detached from the world beyond their walls. Meanwhile, Europe surged ahead.
By the 17th century, European states were experimenting with capitalism, centralized governments, scientific inquiry, and eventually industrialization. The Ottomans remained reliant on land-based taxation, outdated military tactics, and rigid court protocol. The once-formidable Janissaries became a political class unto themselves, corrupt, powerful, and resistant to reform.
Foreign powers began pecking at the empire's edges. In the Battle of Lepanto (1571), the Ottoman navy suffered a decisive blow at the hands of a European coalition. Though the empire recovered naval control, the aura of invincibility had cracked.
The 17th century was marked by costly wars against Persia in the east, Austria and Poland in the north, Venice and Russia in the west. These were not glorious conquests but grinding, indecisive conflicts that drained the treasury and exposed internal rot. Inflation, corruption, and tax farming crippled the economy. In 1683, the Ottomans launched one final bold strike into the heart of Europe, besieging Vienna for a second time but this time, the world had changed. A coalition of European powers, led by the Polish king Jan Sobieski, routed the Ottoman forces. It marked the end of Ottoman territorial expansion in Europe. The empire was no longer feared, it was merely managed.
By the early 18th century, the term “The Sick Man of Europe” began to take root, especially among European diplomats who now circled the Ottoman realm like vultures around a dying beast. And yet, even in decline, the Ottoman story was not devoid of reform or resistance.
The Tanzimat Era (1839–1876) was one of the most ambitious internal reform movements in Ottoman history. The name means “Reorganization” and its goal was clear: to modernize and centralize the empire in the face of mounting threats.
New civil codes were introduced, schools were built and military uniforms were westernized. Railways, telegraphs, and steamships began stitching the empire into modernity. The Hatt-i Sharif of Gülhane, a landmark edict in 1839, promised legal equality for Muslims and non-Muslims alike. For a brief moment, it seemed the Ottomans might revive themselves but modernity came at a price. Conservative backlash was fierce. Religious scholars (the ulama) and Janissaries bristled at reforms they viewed as alien and corrupting. Worse, the reforms did little to stop the rising tide of nationalism that began to unravel the empire from within.
In the Balkans, once-loyal provinces exploded in rebellion. Serbs, Greeks, Bulgarians, and Romanians each fought for independence, inspired by Enlightenment ideals and supported by rival European powers eager to carve up Ottoman territory. The Greek War of Independence (1821–1830) was particularly symbolic, an ancient Christian people throwing off Islamic rule, cheered on by European romantics and intellectuals. The Ottomans lost control of more than just land, they lost the narrative embarasingly.
The 19th century brought more humiliation. In 1853, the Crimean War erupted not between the Ottomans and a traditional rival but with Russia, over the protection of Christian minorities in the Holy Land. Though the Ottomans technically emerged victorious thanks to French and British military support, the war revealed how dependent the empire had become on outside powers.
Financially, the empire was drowning. It had taken enormous loans from European banks to fund wars and reforms. By the 1870s, it defaulted on its debt, leading to the establishment of the Ottoman Public Debt Administration, a foreign-controlled body that siphoned off imperial revenues to repay creditors. Istanbul now danced to the tune of London and Paris. In 1876, a last-gasp effort at revival emerged. Sultan Abdul Hamid II ascended the throne and promised a new constitution, a parliament, civil rights, and modern governance. But just a year later, he dissolved the parliament and ushered in autocratic rule, fearful that constitutionalism would fracture the empire faster than it could be saved.
The early 20th century brought revolution, not recovery. In 1908, the Young Turks, a reformist movement of intellectuals, officers, and exiles, forced the restoration of the constitution and briefly revived hope. But their rule, though idealistic, became increasingly authoritarian. Nationalist policies alienated non-Turkish populations and accelerated the empire’s unraveling.
Then came the final blow: World War I. The Ottomans, led by the Three Pashas, joined the war on the side of Germany and Austria-Hungary, hoping to reclaim lost prestige. Instead, they suffered catastrophic defeats in Arabia, Gallipoli, the Caucasus, and Palestine. The empire bled soldiers, food, and hope.
In 1915, amidst the chaos of war and suspicion of Armenian collaboration with Russian forces, the empire carried out one of the darkest chapters in its history, the Armenian Genocide. An estimated 1.5 million Armenians were killed or deported. It remains one of the most controversial and painful legacies of the empire’s final years. By 1918, with the Armistice of Mudros, the Ottomans surrendered. Allied troops occupied Istanbul, Arab lands were carved up between Britain and France and Anatolia was left in ruins. Yet from this rubble, something stirred.
A former Ottoman officer named Mustafa Kemal, later known as Atatürk, led a resistance movement against both foreign occupation and the Sultan’s crumbling regime. In 1922, the Ottoman Sultanate was abolished. In 1923, the Republic of Turkey was born which is now the country of Türkiye. The Ottoman Empire had died but not with a bang. It died with a slow, complex exhalation of centuries.
Next Time: Holy Roman Empire Part One – The Crown and the Cross
From the coronation of Charlemagne in Rome to the rise of Otto the Great, this is the origin story of an empire that claimed to be the heir of ancient Rome, blending faith, politics, and feudal ambition.
Please go back to top & scroll gently